The Supreme Court recently overruled Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, jettisoning the longstanding principle known as the “Chevron deference,” which held that when a statute is ambiguous, courts must uphold the relevant federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of that statute. Professors Christopher Walker and Daniel Deacon discuss how the ruling has affected the legal world, and where clarity is still needed on how government institutions will proceed.
![Frame 35 980x653](https://alumni.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/Frame-35-980x653-1.jpg)