Free Cooler. Join for Life.

UMSI Researchers Find Journalists Temper (Un)Certainty in Science Communications

February 18, 2022

 • 

Read time:

<5 mins
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print
Uncertainty Social Slide 3 1200
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on print
Presented by School of Information

Sensational headlines are a cause for concern because of their potential to erode the public’s trust in journalism and science. A large-scale study from the University of Michigan School of Information found that journalists tend to temper, not exaggerate, scientific claims. Co-authors Jiaxin Pei and David Jurgens explored how scientific uncertainty is communicated in news articles and tested whether scientific claims are exaggerated. Pei and Jurgens explain the implications for both journalists and readers and discuss the tool they created to calculate the uncertainty in research and reporting.

More from the Alumni Education Gateway
Join the Alumni Education Gateway Email List​
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By using this site, you accept our use of cookies.